If the Shipowner makes an innocent misrepresentation which induces the Charterer to sign the contract，the Charterer may be entitled to（）the charter-party.

If the Shipowner proves that prima facie the cause of damage was excepted，the burden ofproof shifts to（）.

The fact that it has become impossible to procure a cargo （），as a rule，relieve the Charterer of liability.

Unless otherwise agreed，（）must take the goods from alongside，though this obligation may be varied by a custom of the port which is not inconsistent with the express terms of the contract.

To render the（）liable，the shipowners must show that the proximate cause of the detention or expense was trading to a river with a bar or to a port with a bar.

Usually it will be（）who will be liable for the payment of demurrage.

If the vessel does not arrive by the canceling date，and the Charterer（）expenses，these expenses can be claimed by him from the Shipowner where they are in the reasonable contemplation of the parties.

The owner is not at liberty to leave the port of call as soon as the time specified in the charter-party has elapsed，though the Charterer may，if the contract so provides，be liable to compensate（）for the delay．

If the Shipowner agrees to the voyage originally ordered by the Charterer，he is entitled to be paid hire（）for the excess period.

If the Shipowner has failed to carry out a term of a time charter-party whereby he undertakes to maintain the vessel in a seaworthy state，this only（）the Charterer to sue him for damages，and not to repudiate the charter-party.