The master may bind the Shipowner or Charterer（）doing such things as are necessary on the part of the one or of the other to carry out the contract.

Should it appear that war or blockade would prevent the vessel from safely reaching the port of destination and / or discharging the goods thereat，the Carrier（）.

Usually it will be（）who will be liable for the payment of demurrage.

The master’s authority to act in the interests of the cargo owner is part of his general authorityas servant of the Shipowner，and therefore（）will be liable if the master abuses his powers.

The owner is not at liberty to leave the port of call as soon as the time specified in the charter-party has elapsed，though the Charterer may，if the contract so provides，be liable to compensate（）for the delay．

If the Shipowner proves that prima facie the cause of damage was excepted，the burden ofproof shifts to（）.

If the vessel does not arrive by the canceling date，and the Charterer（）expenses，these expenses can be claimed by him from the Shipowner where they are in the reasonable contemplation of the parties.

The Charterers to have option of using Owners’ bunker contracts. This sentence indicates that（）.

There is implied term（）the Charterer must act with reasonable dispatch and in accordance with the ordinary practice of the port in doing those acts which he must do to enable the vessel to become an arrived ship.

If the vessel is not discharged in the time stipulated in the charter-party，the Charterer renders（）liable to pay demurrage or damages for detention，as the case may be.