In modern times，the work of stowage is generally deputed to stevedores，but that does not generally relieve the shipowners（）their duties even though the stevedores are，under the charter-party，to be appointed by the Charterers．

There is implied term（）the Charterer must act with reasonable dispatch and in accordance with the ordinary practice of the port in doing those acts which he must do to enable the vessel to become an arrived ship.

We must take the Charterer’s benefit（）full consideration．

If the Shipowner agrees to the voyage originally ordered by the Charterer，he is entitled to be paid hire（）for the excess period.

That the Shipowner has broken a condition precedent will（）the Charterer from the liability to provide a cargo.

If the ship is delayed by reason of Charterer’s failure to name a port，（）will be liable for the damages.

It is not the Charterer’s duty that（）.

The fixing of a canceling date on a charter-party merely（）warning to the Shipowner that non-arrival by this date may result so as to entitle the Charterer to rescind.

The Shipowner must not stow goods on deck（）there is a trade usage to that effect or the Charterer has given his express or implied consent.

Unless otherwise agreed，（）must take the goods from alongside，though this obligation may be varied by a custom of the port which is not inconsistent with the express terms of the contract.