If the vessel does not arrive by the canceling date，and the Charterer（）expenses，these expenses can be claimed by him from the Shipowner where they are in the reasonable contemplation of the parties.

That the Shipowner has broken a condition precedent will（）the Charterer from the liability to provide a cargo.

The owner is not at liberty to leave the port of call as soon as the time specified in the charter-party has elapsed，though the Charterer may，if the contract so provides，be liable to compensate（）for the delay．

The importance of the distinction between a charter by demise and a charter party proper（）that under the former the master is the agent of the Charterer，not of the Shipowner.

In modern times，the work of stowage is generally deputed to stevedores，but that does not generally relieve the shipowners（）their duties even though the stevedores are，under the charter-party，to be appointed by the Charterers．

If the Charterer sends a vessel to an unsafe port，and she is damaged as a result，he will have to indemnify the（）.

Should it appear that war or blockade would prevent the vessel from safely reaching the port of destination and / or discharging the goods thereat，the Carrier（）.

If the Shipowner proves that prima facie the cause of damage was excepted，the burden ofproof shifts to（）.

We must take the Charterer’s benefit（）full consideration．

The consignee’s refusal to take delivery，or failure to do so within a reasonable time，also puts an end to（）liability as a carrier.