We must take the Charterer’s benefit（）full consideration．

There is implied term（）the Charterer must act with reasonable dispatch and in accordance with the ordinary practice of the port in doing those acts which he must do to enable the vessel to become an arrived ship.

The right to limit liability in connection with the ship（）also extended to Charterers and any person interested in or in possession of the vessel and，in particular，any manager or operator of her.

If the Shipowner has failed to carry out a term of a time charter-party whereby he undertakes to maintain the vessel in a seaworthy state，this only（）the Charterer to sue him for damages，and not to repudiate the charter-party.

The importance of the distinction between a charter by demise and a charter party proper（）that under the former the master is the agent of the Charterer，not of the Shipowner.

Unless otherwise agreed，（）must take the goods from alongside，though this obligation may be varied by a custom of the port which is not inconsistent with the express terms of the contract.

The owner is not at liberty to leave the port of call as soon as the time specified in the charter-party has elapsed，though the Charterer may，if the contract so provides，be liable to compensate（）for the delay．

If the vessel is not discharged in the time stipulated in the charter-party，the Charterer renders（）liable to pay demurrage or damages for detention，as the case may be.

Usually the Charterer has to redeliver the ship in the same good order（）when delivered，fair wear and tear excepted.

The cesser clause mainly purports to relieve（）from paying demurrage.