The Shipowner cannot rely on the excepted perils if he has not（）due diligence to make the ship seaworthy and its nonfulfilment causes the damage，nor can he do so if the vessel makes an unreasonable deviation.

The Shipowner continues to be liable as a carrier（）by the contract，or in the usual course of business，the transit is terminated and the goods have been warehoused for their owner to be ready to receive them.

It may be that，under the contract，freight was made（）to a third person.

Where a period is fixed during which freight is to be paid，the Shipowner must（）to deliver the goods throughout the whole of that period if he wishes to claim payment.

The Shipowner is entitled to（）freight if he is ready to deliver at the port of destination the goods which were loaded.

If the Charterer sends the vessel on her last voyage at a time when there is no expectation that she will be redelivered within a reasonable time of the end of the period of the Charterparty，and she is in fact redelivered late，he（）.

The reason for the obligation to load a full cargo（）that otherwise the Shipowner would lose freight on account of some part of the ship’s carrying capacity not being utilized.

The Shipowner can，however，exempt himself from liability for（），but if he wishes to do so，he must use clear and unambiguous language.

The Shipowner is not（）by the fact that a remote cause of the loss was an excepted peril.

If the master has acted unreasonably，e.g. knowing of the danger in the port has still proceeded to enter it，and danger results，the Charterer will（）.